In the NBA, teams have shown that a lot of times the best
way to get better is to first bottom out.
We are seeing this happen with many teams now because of a strong 2014
draft and free agent class. A classic
case of a team who can’t be bad enough to rebuild or good enough to win is the
Milwaukee Bucks. I have joked at them
for a long time as basically building a team that will go .500 and either just
miss the playoffs and have a low lottery pick or just make the playoffs but
lose early. Since the year I was born
(1987) I have seen one division championship and over the last five years they
have been 12th, 6th, 9th, 9th, 8th
in the Eastern Conference. They have
been middling and frustrating for Bucks fans, they don’t have a big enough
market to attract any stars and haven’t had a rebuilding mentality to be able
to get premier talent from the draft.
The Royals seem to be on their way to become the Bucks of
Major League Baseball (Milwaukee's MLB team may be the NL version). The push for
contention this offseason was well documented, as the Royals made a sacrifice for the
future to add James Shields at the expense of losing Wil Myers while making a
trade for Ervin Santana that essentially resulted in a 1yr/13mil contract. Despite these power moves they have a
below-ish average payroll of just over 80 million dollars, good for 22nd
in the majors. PETOCA and preseason
projections from sportsformulator.com both had the Royals going 80-82.
Fast forward to July 20th, and the Royals
currently sit at 44-49. They have a Pythagorean
record of 46-47. They have a run differential of -7 for the
season thus far. They have experienced
mostly luck in the injury department, and have folks like Danny Duffy and
(maybe) Felipe Paulino preparing to join the big league club in the second
half. For the most park things are not
changing for the Royals unless the front office decides to sell, which seems
unlikely. If they decide they are ‘buyers’,
there is not much out there that would boost a .500 to the playoffs.
When looking at WAR on Fangraphs it shows you that position
by position this is where the Royals Rank:
POS MLB
rank by WAR
ALL Off.
|
17
|
C
|
10
|
1B
|
15
|
2B
|
20
|
SS
|
18
|
3B
|
24
|
RF
|
24
|
CF
|
10
|
LF
|
9
|
DH
|
7
|
SP
|
19
|
RP
|
10
|
|
|
For the season no Royals player has been particularly elite
while no position has been worst in the league bad. Right field was a known issue coming into the
year and Mike Moustakas’ struggles have hurt their ranking at third base. Chris Getz/ Johnny Giavotella/ Miguel Tejeda
have combined for a less than desirable second base. Those three positions have been cancelled out
by legitimately good seasons from Sal Perez, Lorenzo Cain, and Alex Gordon. Eric Hosmer, Billy Butler and and Alcides
Escobar have provided middle of the pack production by position this
season. With the starting pitching,
Shields and Santana have been a nice top of rotation duo, Jeremy Guthrie has
been decent sort of and Luis Mendoza and Wade Davis have been more or less
bad. In the pen, Greg Holland has been
very good while Kelvin Herrera has struggled, but overall the bullpen, which
was seen as a strength coming into the year, has been decent providing the 10th
highest WAR amongst MLB teams.
In terms of prospects, Baseball Prospectus writer Jason
Parks put the Royals system as 7th best in baseball while the
Baseball America Rankings put them 18th prior to the season. Players like Yordano Ventura and Raul
Adalberto Mondosi have a rising stock while a top prospect like Bubba Starling
is still showing growing pains this year in A-ball. I would argue that most of the team’s top
talent is still a few years away in the lower minors.
The Royals have cost controlled talent for the next few
years but unless management decides to break the bank this offseason or sell
some of their more expensive assets I see the Royals 2014 team looking similar
to the 2013 variety. Without the
development of many of their players it appears that the Royals are going to be
pulling a Milwaukee Bucks-like middle of the road finish in the AL Central for a
while.
No comments:
Post a Comment