tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2993104684105764252.post5414123931949833268..comments2024-03-04T04:43:36.452-06:00Comments on Royal Revival: Looking back on MoneyballLandon Adamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07757270442133039299noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2993104684105764252.post-33056703327991635162011-09-26T17:54:57.248-05:002011-09-26T17:54:57.248-05:00I wouldn't disagree with any of that.I wouldn't disagree with any of that.Landon Keefernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2993104684105764252.post-17585110854896690242011-09-23T23:05:54.788-05:002011-09-23T23:05:54.788-05:00Pretty good analysis. The only thing I would point...Pretty good analysis. The only thing I would point out and have mentioned before, is that while they may be leading the moneyball intent from a scouting or strategic point of view, the management of the tactics on the field continue to be stupid old school stuff. Running helps, regardless of success level, bunting helps, etc. I read a comment that said the Royals were a self fulfilling prophecy, they don't believe they can have a big inning so they play small ball so therefore they don't have big innings. The kids seem to be pretty good so maybe they will be good enough to overcome this stuff when the games actually means something.DocJnoreply@blogger.com